Project Sneh in Moradabad presents a significant case study in women’s economic empowerment, rural skill development, and market-linked livelihood creation in Uttar Pradesh. In a district widely associated with brassware, export-oriented craft production, and dense informal labour networks, the initiative has attempted to address a persistent development gap: women who possess discipline, creativity, and family responsibility often remain outside formal income systems because training, mobility, market access, and social permission do not arrive together. Project Sneh’s practical contribution lies in bringing these missing pieces into one organised framework.

The initiative, founded in 2019 and associated with social entrepreneur Shikha Gupta, has been reported as a grassroots effort to provide free vocational training to unemployed women in Moradabad district. Its name carries an intentional emotional meaning: “sneh” translates to “affection” or “love” in Hindi. That choice of name is not merely symbolic. It reflects a development philosophy in which skill training is treated not as a short-term charity intervention, but as a dignified pathway through which women can strengthen household resilience, social confidence, and long-term self-reliance.

At the centre of Project Sneh’s work is a simple but technically important insight: livelihood programmes succeed only when training is connected to real demand. Many skill-development schemes in Bharat teach a craft or a basic trade, but participants often struggle after graduation because they lack buyers, credit, production standards, or links to formal markets. Project Sneh’s model is more robust because it connects village-based training with artisan production, commercial craft orders, and visible market channels. This is the difference between learning stitching as a domestic ability and learning stitching, weaving, or bag-making as an income-generating skill.

The organisation gained wider visibility through its collaboration with H&M HOME, which highlighted handmade decor products crafted by women from Project SNEH in Moradabad. The collaboration described women learning crafts such as handwoven seagrass work and braided rattan production, with products including vases, baskets, trays, and lanterns. This international exposure matters because it places rural women’s artisanal labour within a premium home-decor supply chain rather than confining it to low-margin local selling. It also demonstrates how Bharat’s traditional craft ecosystem can be strengthened when ethical production, design discipline, and export demand are aligned.

Available public information from the H&M collaboration states that 280 women had come to Project SNEH to learn a craft, and that after three months of formal training, participants could become professional artisans. The same account notes that women could either join Moradabad’s wider craft manufacturing sector or establish their own craft shops in their villages. Most strikingly, it reports that 90% of the trained women chose to remain with SNEH after training, producing goods for brands across the world. In the context of vocational training, such retention is an important indicator because it suggests not only training completion but also continuing economic relevance.

The training curriculum appears to be structured around multiple livelihood tracks rather than a single narrow skill. Sewing and tailoring form one core area, moving from basic stitching to more advanced garment and bag construction. Handicraft production forms another, especially products that draw on Moradabad’s existing craft identity and access to export-oriented production culture. Computer literacy has also been developed through village-based labs, while related artisanal and micro-enterprise activities include tote bags, purses, pouches, herbal products, and small food-processing items such as chutney and tea masala. This diversity is important because not every participant has the same time, mobility, aptitude, or household constraints.

The technical strength of such a curriculum lies in its layered design. Basic skill acquisition gives women entry into productive work. Intermediate training improves quality, consistency, and speed. Market-facing production introduces discipline in measurements, finishing, material use, packaging, and deadlines. Digital literacy adds another layer by helping women understand mobile communication, online safety, documentation, and the basic tools increasingly required in the modern economy. A rural livelihood programme becomes more durable when it does not treat women as passive beneficiaries but as workers, producers, and potential entrepreneurs.

Project Sneh’s decentralised implementation is especially relevant for rural women in Uttar Pradesh. Instead of depending only on a central urban training centre, the model has used village-based locations in areas such as Bhola Singh ki Milak, Chaudharpur, and Faleda in Chhajlet block. This choice directly addresses common barriers to women’s participation: transportation costs, domestic responsibilities, time restrictions, safety concerns, and social hesitation around daily travel. When training arrives closer to the village, families are more likely to permit participation, and women are more likely to complete the course.

The “Project Panthini” computer lab initiative further reflects the importance of culturally appropriate learning environments. The term “Panthini,” understood as a female friend or companion, signals a women-centred space where participants can learn without intimidation. Reports refer to 60-day computer courses covering basic operations, internet safety, and digital literacy. Such training may seem modest when compared with advanced technology education, but for women who have had limited access to digital devices, it can be transformative. It helps them handle forms, communicate with buyers or coordinators, understand online payments, and participate with greater confidence in public and economic life.

The sewing centres follow a batch-based approach, with publicly reported examples including multiple completed batches in Chaudharpur. Batch-based training offers administrative clarity: enrolment can be tracked, attendance can be monitored, skill progression can be assessed, and production readiness can be evaluated. It also creates peer learning. Women who begin with uncertainty often gain confidence by watching others master the same tasks. In many rural households, this psychological transition is as important as the technical training itself, because economic participation often requires a woman to first believe that her labour has measurable public value.

The emotional significance of this work becomes clearer when viewed through everyday village life. A woman who earns even a modest independent income may be able to contribute to children’s education, purchase household essentials without waiting for permission, support medical needs, or save for emergencies. These changes may not always appear dramatic in aggregate statistics, but they alter the texture of family decision-making. Economic independence gives women a voice not only in markets but also inside the home. In that sense, Project Sneh’s work belongs to the larger Narishakti tradition of recognising women as active builders of society, not merely dependents within it.

Project Sneh also fits within the broader policy landscape of women’s empowerment in Uttar Pradesh. Government initiatives such as Mission Shakti, the National Rural Livelihoods Mission, and self-help group mobilisation have attempted to bring women into income-generating activities through credit, training, collective organisation, and local enterprise. Reports from Moradabad have referred to thousands of self-help groups and tens of thousands of women linked with self-employment activities. In this environment, Project Sneh functions as a complementary civil-society model: it does not replace state programmes, but it demonstrates how focused training, market linkages, and product discipline can make empowerment more concrete.

The distinction between general self-help group activity and a market-linked craft initiative is worth examining. Self-help groups often begin with savings, small loans, and local production. Their strength lies in collective trust and community-level finance. Project Sneh’s reported model adds specialised training, quality control, and access to higher-value markets. When these two worlds are connected effectively, women can move from subsistence-level production to more stable income opportunities. This is particularly relevant in Moradabad, where craft manufacturing already has infrastructure, export experience, and a skilled artisan culture that can absorb trained women if social barriers are reduced.

Moradabad’s identity as a craft and manufacturing centre gives Project Sneh a structural advantage. Livelihood programmes work best when they build upon local economic strengths instead of importing unrealistic employment models from outside. A district known for brassware, metalwork, home decor, and artisanal production already understands deadlines, bulk orders, buyer specifications, and export standards. Women trained in sewing, weaving, rattan work, seagrass craft, and finishing can therefore connect to an existing ecosystem. This local anchoring is one reason the model appears more practical than generic training programmes that lack a nearby market.

At the same time, the model requires careful sustainability planning. Reliance on a single major commercial partner can create concentration risk. If orders decline, design preferences shift, or procurement strategies change, women’s income streams may be affected. A mature social enterprise model therefore needs diversified buyers, multiple product categories, strong local sales channels, and the ability to absorb demand fluctuations. Products such as tote bags, pouches, herbal hair oils, masalas, and locally made food items may help diversify income, but each category requires its own quality standards, packaging discipline, pricing logic, and market strategy.

Another challenge is measuring outcomes beyond training numbers. Counting how many women completed a course is useful, but it does not fully capture impact. A rigorous assessment would examine monthly income before and after training, consistency of work, savings behaviour, household decision-making power, digital confidence, school retention for children, and the ability to handle financial shocks. It would also track whether women remain employed after six months, one year, and three years. Publicly available information establishes Project Sneh’s training and production narrative, but more independent data on income outcomes would strengthen the evidence base.

The context of women’s labour force participation in Uttar Pradesh makes this discussion urgent. Bharat has made significant advances in education, infrastructure, digital access, and welfare delivery, yet women’s paid workforce participation remains constrained by social norms, care responsibilities, safety concerns, and limited local opportunities. In many households, women work intensely but remain economically invisible because unpaid domestic labour is not counted as formal income. Projects like Sneh become important because they convert skill, time, and effort into recognised economic value while working within the social realities of the community.

There is also a civilisational dimension to this work that aligns with the broader dharmic emphasis on dignity, seva, family responsibility, and community welfare. Economic empowerment does not have to be framed as conflict between women and families. In culturally rooted models, it can be framed as strengthening the household, preserving craft traditions, enhancing self-respect, and expanding the capacity for service. This approach is particularly effective in rural Bharat because it avoids alienating communities while still advancing women’s autonomy and income security.

The role of craft should not be underestimated. Handwork carries memory, discipline, and identity. A handwoven basket or stitched bag is not merely a commodity; it reflects training, patience, design, and the artisan’s capacity to meet a standard that a buyer values. When women from villages around Moradabad produce for premium domestic or international markets, the meaning of rural labour changes. It is no longer seen as informal, supplementary, or invisible. It becomes skilled work capable of entering formal value chains.

Project Sneh’s future trajectory will depend on whether it can scale without weakening its community intimacy. Replication in nearby districts such as Rampur, Bijnor, or Sambhal may be possible, but only if each district’s local economy, transport patterns, women’s mobility, and market access are studied carefully. Scaling a women’s livelihood model is not merely a matter of opening more centres. It requires trainers, raw material supply, quality supervision, working capital, buyer relationships, digital records, and trust within families. Growth must therefore be disciplined rather than merely rapid.

Product diversification is another likely path. Home decor has given the initiative visibility, but apparel, accessories, wellness products, sustainable packaging, and regional food products may offer additional opportunities. Each new product line should be evaluated on four criteria: availability of local raw material, ease of training, margin after labour and packaging costs, and market demand beyond seasonal orders. Sustainable livelihoods are built when women can rely on repeated work, not occasional publicity.

The policy lesson from Project Sneh is clear. Women’s empowerment becomes most effective when skill development, social acceptance, production infrastructure, and market access are designed together. Training alone is insufficient. Credit alone is insufficient. Inspirational messaging alone is insufficient. What works is a full chain: identify women, train them near their homes, build confidence, provide tools, link them to buyers, maintain quality, and help them keep earning. Project Sneh’s reported experience in Moradabad offers precisely this kind of integrated model.

Its broader significance lies in showing how Bharat Positive stories emerge from disciplined local work rather than abstract slogans. A woman learning to operate a sewing machine, a young participant entering a computer lab for the first time, a craftswoman completing an export-quality basket, or a mother contributing to household income through her own skill: these are quiet but powerful indicators of social transformation. Project Sneh demonstrates that economic freedom is often woven slowly, stitch by stitch, through training, trust, and dignified work.

---

Inspired by this post on Hindu Post.

---