-
Janeu at the Exam Gate: What the KCET Row Reveals About Religious Freedom

The Karnataka CET janivara row has raised important questions about examination security, religious freedom, and institutional sensitivity in Bharat. Reports that students were asked to remove the Janeu or Kalava before entering an examination hall show how routine procedures can become deeply personal when they touch sacred practice. This article explains the cultural significance of…
-
Why Imported Secularism Still Fails India’s Dharmic Civilizational Reality

This essay examines why Western secularism does not map neatly onto India’s dharmic civilizational experience. It traces the term “secular” to European Christian conflicts between Church and State and contrasts that history with India’s decentralized traditions of Dharma, Rajadharma, sampradaya, and sacred plurality. The discussion explains how the 42nd Amendment inserted “secular” into the Preamble…
-
India’s Two Powerful Visions: Heritage, Secularism, and the Future of Dharma

India’s debate over national identity is often framed as a secular versus communal conflict, but the deeper question concerns civilizational memory. One vision sees India’s past as a burden to be overcome through rapid Westernization, while another argues that India’s future must be rooted in serious study of its cultural and spiritual inheritance. A balanced…
-
Constitutional Confusion: The Urgent Case for Fair Religious Studies in India

Article 28 of the Indian Constitution is often read as a strict barrier between religion and State-funded education, but the deeper issue is the difference between religious instruction and academic religious studies. This article explains why a secular republic can prohibit coercive religious teaching while still supporting rigorous scholarship on religion, philosophy, and civilization. It…
-
West Bengal Ends Religion-Based Aid: Imam–Muezzin–Purohit Stipends Reviewed for Neutral Welfare

West Bengal has announced the sunset of religion-based aid schemes and a comprehensive review of imam, muezzin, and purohit stipends, signaling a transition toward religion-neutral welfare. The move is framed within Articles 14, 15, 25–27 of the Constitution and long-standing jurisprudence that safeguards religious freedom while prohibiting the promotion of any particular denomination using tax…
-
Ram Navami Clashes, Nitesh Rane’s ‘Equal Rules’ Call, and a Blueprint for Harmony

A heated exchange around Ram Navami 2026 and Nitesh Rane’s call for “equal rules” across festivals highlights a core civic challenge: protecting religious freedom while ensuring public order. This analysis maps the constitutional framework (Articles 14 and 25–28), explains content-neutral, time–place–manner regulation, and outlines how parity looks in real operations. It details actionable stepssingle-window permissions,…
-
Maharashtra’s Freedom of Religion Bill 2026: Safeguards, Constitutional Tests, and Harmony

On 18 March 2026, the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly passed the Freedom of Religion Bill 2026, presented as “Not Against Any Religion.” Congress has called it unconstitutional, while Shiv Sena (UBT) extended support, prompting a rare cross-aisle debate. The Bill sits within a constitutional framework that protects freedom of conscience (Article 25) yet permits states to…
-
Unmasking Bihar’s Jungle Raj: Shahabuddin, Lalu, and the Price of Criminalized Politics

This analysis revisits Bihar’s “Jungle Raj” to examine how political criminalisation took root in the 1990s and why its lessons remain urgent today. Drawing on reporting by Sankarshan Thakur, a PUCL fact-finding bulletin, and intelligence accounts cited by Arun Shourie, it traces the rise of Mohammad Shahabuddin and the enabling environment that blurred lines between…
